![]() |
October 1st to October 7th 2007
|
TUESDAY October 2 Bang out of order! ![]() |
WEDNESDAY October 3 Infinity: a challenge to astronomers ![]() |
THURSDAY October 4 The Argument! ![]()
"Dear Jonathan, It is true to say that this is a work in progress and there are a lot of unanswered questions. No doubt the theory will evolve and change over time as new data is found and new discoveries are made. But it most certainly is not full of holes. You're talking rubbish. The universe is expanding. It isn't standing still as was once thought to be the case. The galaxies are moving away from each other. Since the universe is expanding and the galaxies are moving away from each other (they are even accelerating which is a genuine mystery and this is something yet to be explained) logically they must once have been closer together and even colliding. Understand? If they are flying away from each other then once upon a time billions of years ago they must have concentrated together. This is a very simplistic reason for the theory of the big bang.
Do us all a favour and write about tarot cards and other unscientific nonsensical superstitions. Leave the science to people who know what they are talking about."
"Hi Jonathan,
Dear Jonathan, Secondly, you really must notice the difference between astronomers, astrophysicists and cosmologists. Astronomers are sort of like trainspoters; Size, place and time matter. Astrophysicists are mostly concerned with "how do things work". They are good at considering both sides of the coin. Theories are acceptable if they are useful; to show how a system works - not how something does not work. So the idea of Big Bang says nothing about the thought of infinity but everything about a phase transition. Infinity is first year university material. What we are taught is "get it" Do not try to understand it because it will take an infinite amount of time". The Big Bang theory is just a road marker. The cosmological question is very simple: Which of the time and space considerations could we do away with and still "end up with the world we know today". Do we need the Big bang? Do we need Inflation theory? Do we need King's theory, quantum field theory, Higgs fields etc? The answer is yes and no. NO because the answer is not found by adding up details. Yes because, the concepts link up. The truth is that nothing of what either the astronomers, astrophysicists or cosmologists say is out there is really out there. They are just concepts and labels that can be tagged to the light that reaches us here on earth. The whole idea of astrology is to avoid infinity by placing the whole of human possibility upon 9 + 1 + 1 objects in our solar system; humans on earth in relation to 8 planets, the sun + Pluto + one moon. Apparently, size does matter. Place does matter. Time does matter. Who's clinging on to Pluto for psychological support? Which of the planets, moon phases etc could you do away with and still end up with astrology? The Big Bang for Astrologers is the sun, planets and earth's moon. If you could remove the objects (especially time, place and SIZE) you would be dealing with infinity.
Be careful with that whip - it may be your own buttocks you're chasing!"
Dear Jonathan,
Dear Jonathan,
Dear Jonathan, Nice one - brilliantly put!
Regards |
FRIDAY October 5 Mercury Retro Alert ![]() |
SATURDAY October 5 New Moon and Mercury ![]() |
SUNDAY October 6 New Moon and Mercury ![]() |
|
Click here for Jonathan Cainer's Daily Zodiac Forecasts |
|